Bronchodilator Response of FEV6 and FEV3 as Surrogates of Forced Vital Capacity
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND Spirometry as a non-invasive and inexpensive test is widely used for occupational health evaluations. Bronchodilator test is used for the assessment of airflow limitation and increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or forced vital capacity (FVC) is considered as a positive response. This study was performed to assess the response of forced expiratory volume in 6 seconds (FEV6), forced expiratory volume in 3 seconds (FEV3), and forced expiratory time (FET) to bronchodilator administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this cross-sectional study, the response of FEV3, FEV6, FEV1/FEV3, FEV1/FEV6 and FET to bronchodilator administration was assessed in subjects referred to Yazd occupational medicine clinic regardless of their diagnosis. The average increase in spirometric parameters (i.e. FVC, FEV1, FEV1/FVC, FEV3, FEV6, FEV1/FEV3, FEV1/FEV6 and FET) was measured. The difference between baseline and post-bronchodilator spirometries was assessed by calculating absolute change and change from baseline as well. Data analysis was done by Student's t test, chi square test and Pearson's correlation test. RESULTS Totally 104 subjects were entered in the study. FEV1 showed the highest response to bronchodilator. FVC response to bronchodilator was correlated with FET, but such correlation was not observed for FEV6 and FEV3. The mean increase in FEV6, FEV3, and FET after bronchodilator administration was 50.90 ml (2.23%), 110.51 ml (3.08%) and -1.85 s, respectively. CONCLUSION FVE6 can be used as a substitute for FVC for the assessment of bronchodilator response without the need for FET adjustment.
منابع مشابه
Assessing small airways disease.
A simple method of assessing smaller airways obstruction is easily available and could be used retrospectively. In contrast to the mean forced expiratory flow between 25 and 75% of forced vital capacity (FVC; FEF25–75%), which measures the mid-portion of exhalation ending at nearly the same time as the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) in these subjects, the FEV3/FVC% or (1-FEV3/FVC...
متن کاملResponses of FEV6, FVC, and FET to inhaled bronchodilator in the adult general population
BACKGROUND The assessment of bronchodilator-induced change in forced vital capacity (FVC) is dependent on forced expiratory time (FET) in subjects with airflow limitation. Limited information is available on the concurrent responses of FVC, forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV6), and FET in the bronchodilation test among patients with obstructive airways disease or in the general popula...
متن کاملA Simple Measure to Assess Hyperinflation and Air Trapping: 1-Forced Expiratory Volume in Three Second / Forced Vital Capacity
BACKGROUND Several recent studies have suggested that 1 minus-forced expiratory volume expired in 3 seconds / forced vital capacity (1-FEV3/FVC) may be an indicator of distal airway obstruction and a promising measure to evaluate small airways dysfunction. AIMS To investigate the associations of 1-FEV3/FVC with the spirometric measures and lung volumes that assess small airways dysfunction an...
متن کاملForced Expiratory Volume in 6 s (FEV6) and FEV1/FEV6 Values as a Viable Alternative for Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC Values During Pregnancy in South East Nigeria: A Preliminary Study
BACKGROUND Forced expiratory volume in 6 s (FEV6) and FEV1/FEV6 ratio have traditionally been used as a surrogate for forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1/FVC in the assessment of spirometric lung function in nonpregnant subjects. However, the existence of this relationship during pregnancy is yet to be ascertained. AIM The aim of this study was to determine if FEV6 and FEV1/FEV6 can effectiv...
متن کاملIs forced expiratory volume in six seconds a valid alternative to forced vital capacity?
We have read with interest the article by HANSEN et al. [1] in a recent issue of the European Respiratory Journal, stating that the use of forced expiratory volume in six seconds (FEV6) reduces the sensitivity of obstructive lung disease detection. Their study population of 3,515 current smokers, with a 17.5% prevalence of obstruction, found a sensitivity of only 76.8% and a specificity of 98.2...
متن کامل